Remedial Approach Selection – Giving a Thoughtful Evaluation of Strategies featured imageRemedial Approach Selection – Giving a Thoughtful Evaluation of Strategies
Not every remedial approach will work on every site. Certainly not every remedial approach is ideally suited for every site. AEL takes a careful approach to evaluating and selecting remedial strategies that are matched to the client’s specific goals for the site. When a Phase II ESA finds impacts above the allowable limit on a…
Understanding A CSM – Using On-Site Testing to Strategically Fill Data Gaps featured imageUnderstanding A CSM – Using On-Site Testing to Strategically Fill Data Gaps
The Triad approach is a set of three strategies, supported by the US EPA, which is widely recognized as the proven modern standard for characterizing and remediating impacted sites. While Canadian regulation does not specifically rely on the Triad approach (although it may introduce similar regulation at some point), Canadian best practices do favour the…
Case Study: Changing Course During a Phase 2 ESA featured imageCase Study: Changing Course During a Phase 2 ESA
New information collected on site during a client’s Phase 2 ESA, resulted in the need to adapt their sampling plan.
Real-Time Results with the XRF featured imageReal-Time Results with the XRF
When accurate real time screening results are collected during an environmental site investigation or remediation, the team gains an invaluable tool for directing field work. The use of on-site testing ensures that adequate information is collected in order to make confident decisions about site conditions and next steps. On-site soil testing tools such as ultraviolet…
Topographic Site Surveys – Traditional, Modern and Beyond! featured imageTopographic Site Surveys – Traditional, Modern and Beyond!
Topographic site information increases certainty in a range of operations from benchmarking, calculating drainage, estimating stockpile volumes or potential excavations.
Are All Phase One Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) Created Equal? featured imageAre All Phase One Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) Created Equal?
Comparing O.Reg 153/04 and CSA Standard Environmental Site Assessments in Ontario, and when one is required versus the other.
How Is Chemical Remediation Accomplished? featured imageHow Is Chemical Remediation Accomplished?
This was a recent site which AEL worked on, which was contaminated after a fuel tank leaked on the property. A chemical remediation was best suited for the site. This photo shows the excavator beginning to dig a hole for remediation trench. The hole would be approximately 5 m x 5 m down to groundwater,…
Ensuring High-Quality Data to Reduce Uncertainty in Phase 2 ESA featured imageEnsuring High-Quality Data to Reduce Uncertainty in Phase 2 ESA
When gathering data for a Phase 2 ESA or other reports through on-site testing or environmental site screening, it is important to note that the results are only as good as the data. On-Site Data Quality & Why It Matters: Inaccurate data means that decisions will be based on erroneous beliefs and a poor site…
Understanding a CSM – The Basics in Ontario featured imageUnderstanding a CSM – The Basics in Ontario
When managing a site in Ontario, it is essential to understand Ontario Regulation 153/04 and the environmental due diligence it requires. What Is A CSM? A Conceptual Site Model (CSM) is one of the requirements that shapes the Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) process (both Phase I and II) and is required for a Record of…
Remote Demolition and Abatement Project – Resolute Bay, Nunavut featured imageRemote Demolition and Abatement Project – Resolute Bay, Nunavut
AEL completed a major abatement project of a flight services station in Canada’s Far North. A logistically challenging endeavour, AEL was proud to be part of a highly capable team to manage this work. The project was completed over 3 seasons due to the harsh climate of the region. Background: AEL was retained to manage…
